In this post of our series on Intento, we dive into gas cost efficiency. With a comparative analysis, we check out the economic implications and advantages that position Intento as a transformative, long term viable force in the Web3 landscape.
Gelato on Ethereum
Our analyisis begins with a critical examination of Gelato on Ethereum, a prominent player in the blockchain automation space. The protocol logic cost of 940,000 gas, coupled with a 20% protocol fee, brings the protocol costs per execution to about $50. This bot-based off-chain model introduces complexities and risks associated with the use of the proxy contract. The system is permissioned and thus uses trusted actors. Though it may not be the ideal solution from a security standpoint, Gelato is a practical solution for simple tasks that would normally require human intervention.
CronCat on Juno and Neutron
Further, we explore the execution costs associated with CronCat on Juno and Neutron. It is a similar off-chain bot system, but for chains in the Cosmos ecosystem that use CosmWasm. With total execution cost hovering around 720,000 gas, the breakdown reveals that the execution itself generally accounts for approximately 170,000 gas, so the protocol logic utilizes about 550,000 gas. This design appears to be more efficient than Gelato's but remains a system of off-chain actors that need to be incentivized.
Intento's intent module
As the focal point of our analysis, the Intent module has gas cost that we have tested to be as low as 90,365 gas. This stark contrast positions Intento as a frontrunner in gas cost efficiency, disrupting traditional models and setting a new standard for optimal resource utilization.
Using less gas allows the chain to process more actions, saves users money and enables them to perform actions on a higher frequency. With blocks 300M gas in size, the current systems could process at most 400 actions per block, and Intento’s design can process over 3000 actions, in a secure, decentralized way, making it the perfect system for actions on the interchain.
Intento's solution is highly efficient and scalable, especially combined with a modular stack. Hence, Intento can be a long-term viable solution for protocols and end-users that want to optimize their on-chain processes.